AI startup argues scraping every song on the internet is ‘fair use’

When most tech companies are challenged with a lawsuit, the expected defense is to deny wrongdoing. To give a reasonable explanation of why the business' actions were not breaking any laws. Music AI startups Udio and Suno have gone for a different approach: admit to doing exactly what you were sued for.

Udio and Suno were sued in June, with music labels Universal Music Group, Warner Music Group and Sony Music Group claiming they trained their AI models by scraping copyrighted materials from the Internet. In a court filing today, Suno acknowledged that its neural networks do in fact scrape copyrighted material: "It is no secret that the tens of millions of recordings that Suno’s model was trained on presumably included recordings whose rights are owned by the Plaintiffs in this case." And that's because its training data "includes essentially all music files of reasonable quality that are accessible on the open internet," which likely include millions of illegal copies of songs.

But the company is taking the line that its scraping falls under the umbrella of fair use. "It is fair use under copyright law to make a copy of a protected work as part of a back-end technological process, invisible to the public, in the service of creating an ultimately non-infringing new product," the statement reads. Its argument seems to be that since the AI-generated tracks it creates don't include samples, illegally obtaining all of those tracks to train the AI model isn't a problem.

Calling the defendants' actions "evading and misleading," the RIAA, which initiated the lawsuit, had an unsurprisingly harsh response to the filing. "Their industrial scale infringement does not qualify as ‘fair use’. There’s nothing fair about stealing an artist’s life’s work, extracting its core value, and repackaging it to compete directly with the originals," a spokesperson for the organization said. "Defendants had a ready lawful path to bring their products and tools to the market – obtain consent before using their work, as many of their competitors already have. That unfair competition is directly at issue in these cases."

Whatever the next phase of this litigation entails, prepare your popcorn. It should be wild.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/ai-startup-argues-scraping-every-song-on-the-internet-is-fair-use-233132459.html?src=rss

HOT news

Related posts

Latest posts

Glamsterdam Improve: Sepolia Blocks Depart Most of Ethereum’s New Fuel Capability Unused

Ethereum’s Glamsterdam improve has raised Sepolia’s block-gas restrict from about 60 million to just about 200 million, giving builders a dwell take a look...

3 Main Altcoins That Could Plunge Additional as Analyst Flags Extra Draw back

The cryptocurrency market took a significant hit after the Monday fakeout rally, by which BTC and primarily all alts tried to interrupt out however...

Vitalik Buterin: AI Danger Doesn’t Justify Rushed Pockets Strikes

Vitalik Buterin has warned that fast advances in AI-assisted arithmetic may make ECDSA and different structured cryptographic programs much less safe earlier than anticipated,...

This is what the $6,000 Floor RTX Spark Dev Field seems to be like

Actually, a bit like an outsized Lego brick.

Google Gemini AI Predicts Chainlink (LINK) Might Hit $100 in 2026

Google Gemini AI predicts that, with a landmark catalyst coming for Chainlink, the LINK token might surge to $100 by January 1, 2027. With...

Want to stay up to date with the latest news?

We would love to hear from you! Please fill in your details and we will stay in touch. It's that simple!