AI startup argues scraping every song on the internet is ‘fair use’

When most tech companies are challenged with a lawsuit, the expected defense is to deny wrongdoing. To give a reasonable explanation of why the business' actions were not breaking any laws. Music AI startups Udio and Suno have gone for a different approach: admit to doing exactly what you were sued for.

Udio and Suno were sued in June, with music labels Universal Music Group, Warner Music Group and Sony Music Group claiming they trained their AI models by scraping copyrighted materials from the Internet. In a court filing today, Suno acknowledged that its neural networks do in fact scrape copyrighted material: "It is no secret that the tens of millions of recordings that Suno’s model was trained on presumably included recordings whose rights are owned by the Plaintiffs in this case." And that's because its training data "includes essentially all music files of reasonable quality that are accessible on the open internet," which likely include millions of illegal copies of songs.

But the company is taking the line that its scraping falls under the umbrella of fair use. "It is fair use under copyright law to make a copy of a protected work as part of a back-end technological process, invisible to the public, in the service of creating an ultimately non-infringing new product," the statement reads. Its argument seems to be that since the AI-generated tracks it creates don't include samples, illegally obtaining all of those tracks to train the AI model isn't a problem.

Calling the defendants' actions "evading and misleading," the RIAA, which initiated the lawsuit, had an unsurprisingly harsh response to the filing. "Their industrial scale infringement does not qualify as ‘fair use’. There’s nothing fair about stealing an artist’s life’s work, extracting its core value, and repackaging it to compete directly with the originals," a spokesperson for the organization said. "Defendants had a ready lawful path to bring their products and tools to the market – obtain consent before using their work, as many of their competitors already have. That unfair competition is directly at issue in these cases."

Whatever the next phase of this litigation entails, prepare your popcorn. It should be wild.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/ai-startup-argues-scraping-every-song-on-the-internet-is-fair-use-233132459.html?src=rss

HOT news

Related posts

Latest posts

Getty Pictures is canceling its $3.7 billion Shutterstock merger because of UK restrictions

Getty Pictures has moved to terminate a $3.7 billion merger with rival Shutterstock because of restrictions imposed by UK regulators.

Crypto Information, July 1: Bitcoin Value Holds $59K as Ethereum Stays Regular on MiCA Day Zero

Markets opened Q3 steadily, Bitcoin value is holding the $59K degree, Ethereum reveals energy at what could possibly be the underside, and MiCA full...

Bitcoin (BTC) Begins July Beneath $60K, Cardano (ADA) Lastly Rebounds: Market Watch

June was brutal for the first cryptocurrency, with its value crashing about 20% over the month. And despite the fact that July is often...

Utorg Obtains MiCA License as July 1 Deadline Forces A lot of the Trade Out of Europe

Utorg, a crypto pockets and card platform constructed on institutional-grade infrastructure, as we speak introduced it has obtained full authorization underneath the EU’s...

US authorities permits Anthropic to redeploy its Mythos and Fable AI fashions

Anthropic will begin its customers' entry to Mythos and Fable tomorrow, July 1.

Want to stay up to date with the latest news?

We would love to hear from you! Please fill in your details and we will stay in touch. It's that simple!