Key Takeaways:
- Justin Solar says First Digital Belief has misused TUSD reserves.
- Allegations embrace violations of fiduciary responsibility, unlicensed funding exercise, and bribery.
- Solar launched a bounty program to get well misplaced funds and encourage whistleblowers.
- The claims increase broader questions on regulatory accountability in Hong Kong.
Justin Solar has accused Hong Kong-based custodian First Digital Belief (FDT) of misappropriating greater than $500 million in TUSD property via a sequence of unauthorized transactions and hid transfers.
SEVEN Sins by First Digital Belief (FDT)
First Digital Belief (FDT) isn’t solely bancrupt but in addition concerned in quite a few ongoing crimes. Every of us ought to act as quickly as attainable—don’t wait till it’s too late and reside to remorse it.
In Hong Kong, a belief firm performing as a…— H.E. Justin Solar
(@justinsuntron) April 8, 2025
In an in depth social media submit on April 8, Solar recognized seven alleged breaches of regulation and fiduciary responsibility, starting with the misuse of custodial funds held on behalf of TUSD.
First Digital Belief Accused of Diverting Shopper Funds
He claimed FDT rerouted the property to ARIA DMCC with out shopper consent, violating Hong Kong’s Securities and Futures (Shopper Cash) Guidelines, which require segregated custody and prohibit unauthorized withdrawals.
The accusations prolong to FDT’s funding actions. Although registered as a Belief or Firm Service Supplier (TCSP), FDT holds no SFC license to conduct regulated funding actions.
Solar stated FDT facilitated investments via entities together with ARIA, TrueCoin (based by Alex De Lorraine), and Crossbridge/Finaport, bypassing regulatory oversight and providing no transparency into fund deployment.
He additionally alleged legal fraud underneath Hong Kong’s Theft Ordinance, citing false information and misleading statements issued to cowl up the reallocation of shopper property.
In line with Solar, paperwork had been falsified to counsel the funds remained intact and correctly invested.
Different claims embrace the laundering of funds via offshore buildings and the acceptance of undisclosed commissions—conduct that Solar stated might violate Hong Kong’s Prevention of Bribery Ordinance and set off investigation by the Impartial Fee Towards Corruption.
“Every of us ought to act as quickly as attainable—don’t wait till it’s too late and reside to remorse it,” Solar wrote.
Justin Solar Launches $50 Million Bounty, Seeks Whistleblowers
Solar beforehand introduced a $50 million bounty to assist get well TUSD funds allegedly misappropriated by First Digital Belief.
(1/3)
$50 Million Bounty Program – First Digital Belief Rip-off
I hereby formally announce: A $50 million bounty program (equal to roughly 10% of my liquidity assist or the stolen TUSD reserves) can be supplied to get well the TUSD reserves misappropriated by unhealthy actors…— H.E. Justin Solar
(@justinsuntron) April 4, 2025
This system invitations whistleblowers to submit leads via a devoted portal, with rewards contingent on verified restoration outcomes.
“This isn’t nearly cash—it’s about justice,” Solar stated.
Solar in contrast the case to the FTX state of affairs, the place misuse of shopper funds was at the very least framed as collateralized loans backed by fairness and token holdings.
In distinction, he stated FDT moved funds offshore with no disclosures, no collateral, and no pretense of construction.
Steadily Requested Questions (FAQs):
Can Hong Kong regulators prosecute a case like this?
Sure. The Securities and Futures Fee (SFC) and the Impartial Fee Towards Corruption (ICAC) have authority to research violations associated to fraud, unlicensed exercise, and bribery.
How does this case differ from the FTX collapse, in accordance with Solar?
FTX framed misuse of funds as collateralized loans; right here, the funds had been allegedly moved off-balance sheet with no construction, collateral, or disclosure to purchasers.
What might occur if the allegations are confirmed true?
FDT and people concerned might face legal prosecution, civil legal responsibility, regulatory penalties, and everlasting lack of license.
The submit Justin Solar Calls Out Seven Sins by First Digital Belief appeared first on Cryptonews.