A former OpenSea product supervisor has efficiently overturned his conviction in what was as soon as hailed as the primary insider buying and selling case involving non-fungible tokens.
The ruling by a US federal appeals court docket on Thursday marks a big setback for prosecutors hoping to use conventional monetary crime legal guidelines to the fast-evolving crypto sector.
The case centered on Nathaniel Chastain, a 35-year-old Massachusetts native who managed homepage curation at OpenSea, the world’s largest NFT market.
In Could 2023, Chastain was convicted of wire fraud and cash laundering for utilizing insider information to purchase NFTs simply earlier than they had been featured on the platform’s entrance web page, then flipping them for revenue.
Breaking Information: Reversal in Nate Chastain Case–second Circuit Tosses NFT "Insider Buying and selling" Conviction
In a shocking reversal, the U.S. Court docket of Appeals for the Second Circuit has vacated Nate Chastain’s conviction for wire fraud and cash laundering, dealing a severe blow to the… pic.twitter.com/l4iLispCX7— Carlo
(@TheDeFiDefender) July 31, 2025
OpenSea NFT Insider Case Undone by Misguided Jury Steerage
Court docket filings confirmed he made roughly $57,000 by 15 such trades, utilizing nameless wallets to hide his id. He later transferred the proceeds into his private account.
Prosecutors described the scheme as theft of confidential enterprise data, arguing it constituted a misuse of OpenSea’s property.
Nevertheless, on enchantment, the 2nd US Circuit Court docket of Appeals in Manhattan disagreed. In a 2-1 determination, the court docket dominated that the jury acquired flawed directions, successfully permitting a conviction primarily based solely on unethical habits somewhat than precise theft of property with business worth.
Appeals Court docket Faults Obscure Jury Directions in OpenSea Case
Decide Steven Menashi, writing for almost all, mentioned the decrease court docket erred by telling jurors that Chastain could possibly be responsible even when the knowledge he used lacked tangible worth to OpenSea. He additionally criticized the instruction that jurors may convict in the event that they discovered Chastain’s conduct violated broad notions of honesty and honest play.
Menashi warned that utilizing such a typical may make practically any misleading act a legal offense. The appeals court docket returned the case to US District Decide Jesse Furman for additional proceedings. It isn’t but clear whether or not prosecutors intend to retry Chastain.
Court docket Narrows Definition of ‘Property’ in Wire Fraud Circumstances
The ruling sharply restricted how the federal government can apply the wire fraud statute to confidential data. The court docket held that such data will need to have clear business worth to the employer—one thing prosecutors did not show on this case.
The featured NFT knowledge, in line with the opinion, was not monetized by OpenSea and was not handled as a useful asset internally. That made it too “ethereal” to qualify as property below the regulation.
Compounding the issue for the federal government, the jury was informed it may convict primarily based on conduct that was merely unethical. That instruction, the court docket discovered, “tainted the decision past restore.”
Decide Jose Cabranes dissented, saying he would have upheld the conviction. The US Legal professional’s workplace in Manhattan has not commented on whether or not it plans to pursue the case once more.
Ruling Undercuts DOJ’s Early Effort to Police NFT Markets
Chastain had already served his three-month jail sentence whereas his enchantment was pending. His authorized group welcomed the choice, calling the case a “miscarriage of justice.”
The conviction was introduced in June 2022, because the NFT market was booming, estimated at practically $40b.
Prosecutors had positioned the case as a sign that the digital asset house wouldn’t escape scrutiny. Thursday’s ruling, nevertheless, might pressure the federal government to rethink the way it approaches crypto-related offenses.
In a separate matter, OpenSea itself got here below regulatory fireplace final 12 months when the SEC launched an investigation into whether or not the platform operated as an unregistered securities alternate. That probe closed with out motion in February, in line with co-founder Devin Finzer.
The publish Ex-OpenSea Worker Cleared in First NFT Insider Buying and selling Attraction — Right here’s What Modified appeared first on Cryptonews.